On January 6, 2025, Governor General Mary Simon granted Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s request to prorogue Parliament until March 24, 2025.
Outside of Parliament, the Liberal Party of Canada is set to start a new leadership election. Trudeau intends to step down as Prime Minister once a new Liberal Party leader is chosen, and when Parliament returns on March 24, we expect that a non-confidence vote will pass, triggering a federal election.
But what’s happening to Parliament from now until March 24? What does it even mean to “prorogue” Parliament?
We can help! We explain what prorogation means, and what the process will look like, below.
When Parliament is prorogued, it means that the Governor General ends a session of Parliament. Prorogation typically happens at least once between elections. It allows the Government to reset its priorities and set a new agenda by opening a new session with a Throne Speech, and introducing a new set of bills for deliberation in the House.
Four years is a long time in politics. Ideas that may have seemed great during an election may be less so now. Meanwhile, new priorities have moved to the forefront. So prorogation is a useful way to reboot the Government's agenda.
Between elections Parliament is considered in session, and elected Members of Parliament and appointed Senators are in Parliament making laws and setting budgets. When they leave the houses even for the night, Parliament needs to be officially paused in a few different ways, so that laws can't be passed in the absence of legislators.
An adjournment separates one meeting, or sitting, of the House of Commons (or Senate) from the next. It can last a few hours, overnight or over the weekend. A longer adjournment is often referred to as a recess, such as over the summer. The House of Commons and Senate determine their own sitting schedule, and when they will adjourn or recess.
With prorogation, the Government alone decides on the timing, and it applies to both the House of Commons and Senate. Prorogation ends the parliamentary session by terminating all business (bills and committees) of both houses of Parliament. Bills in progress towards becoming a law then die on the order paper (a dramatic term meaning "are terminated"). At the start of a new session, the House of Commons may vote to reinstate some of the bills that lapsed, and to restart interrupted committee business. So current legislation in progress, such as the Online Harms Act and Capital Gains tax, have “died” for now, and the House of Commons would have to vote to revive them.
Dissolution puts an end not only to the current session but to Parliament itself. It ends all business in both the House of Commons and Senate, and triggers a new election. The Government shifts into a "caretaker" mode at that point, managing the daily business of government until after the election.
Prorogation can be thought of as a bigger break than an adjournment or recess, but less final than dissolution.
Under Canada's constitution, the Governor General has the power to prorogue Parliament. However, by constitutional convention, that decision is taken only on the advice of the Prime Minister, allowing the decision to remain with an elected representative of the Canadian people. The Governor General may ask questions or seek more information, but only in very exceptional cases should they refuse to follow the Prime Minister's advice. In the provincial legislatures, the Premiers and the Lieutenant Governors hold these roles.
In effect, yes. This is largely uncontroversial when the Prime Minister enjoys the confidence of the House, in other words, when they have the support of the majority of elected Members of Parliament. If the confidence of the House is in doubt, as in a minority Government situation, prorogation becomes more contentious.
A few instances, federally and provincially, have provoked serious debate when it seemed like the Government was using prorogation to avoid losing power in the House. Prorogation can be used to avoid losing a confidence vote, to wait out a tenuous opposition coalition, to give the governing party time to get their affairs in order or generally avoid a sticky situation. The ability of a Prime Minister to single-handedly control prorogation is one of the examples given when Canadians express growing concern about centralization of power in the Prime Minister's office.
The 2008 prorogation by Stephen Harper is one of the more famous examples of a controversial use of prorogation.
By and large though, prorogation itself is a routine and accepted practice.
Prorogation is intended to ensure the continued good governance of the country, and its timing reflects this. In some cases, Parliament is prorogued at the start of a scheduled recess. This gives the Government time to sketch out its revised agenda during the break, and the Opposition can use the time to plan as well. On other occasions, the Government prefers to keep the session open during much of the recess to make it easier to recall the House of Commons from adjournment, or to allow important committee work to continue. Still other times, when prorogation occurs when there is no scheduled recess, it has made sense to open a new session soon thereafter-even on the same day.
While new laws cannot be made during prorogation, cabinet and bureaucratic business continues, and officials from all parties work out plans for the next session. Whenever the House is not in session, including during prorogation, MPs have a number of other tasks, like connecting with constituents in their home riding.
The Prime Minister and cabinet continue to fulfill their respective roles during prorogation. If there's a crisis, they'll be the ones responding. If new legislation is required, or some matter arises that the Government believes needs parliamentary attention, Parliament might be recalled before the scheduled start of the new session. In that case, the Governor General issues a new proclamation fixing the revised date for the start of the new session.